Thursday, October 21, 2021

ITF blasts Maria Sharapova for ‘making example of me’ doping rap

ITF hit back at Maria Sharapova by defending its procedures and the tribunal which originally handed down a two-year ban to the Russian in January.

By: AFP | London |
October 6, 2016 2:30:26 pm
ITF, International Tennis Federation, ITF doping, ITF ban, Maria Sharapova, Sharapova, Sharapova doping, Sharapova doping ban, Sharapova ITF, sports, sports news, tennis news, tennis Maria Sharapova had her initial doping verdict reduced from two years to 15 months by CAS. (Source: Ap File photo)

The International Tennis Federation (ITF) has blasted Maria Sharapova after she said that the governing body was attempting to make an example of her during her bitter doping ban. The 29-year-old Russian superstar, who had a two-year suspension slashed to 15 months on Tuesday by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), also said the ITF exhibited a lack of neutrality in the dispute.

In an interview with the US broadcaster PBS, the world’s highest-earning sportswoman was asked that as a former world number one and five-time major winner, if the ITF was trying to make an example of her. “I never wanted to believe that, but I am starting to think that,” said the Russian. “I got a 24-month suspension, but they (the ITF) wanted four years for me.”

But the London-based ITF hit back on Wednesday, defending its procedures and the tribunal which originally handed down a two-year ban after Sharapova tested positive for meldonium at the Australian Open in January.”The ITF did not ‘try to ban

“The ITF did not ‘try to ban Ms. Sharapova for four years’. The ITF took the position that it is the independent
tribunal’s responsibility to determine what the appropriate sanction should be,” said a statement from the governing body released to the British Press Association. “This included the decision as to whether Ms. Sharapova met the requirements set out in the tennis anti-doping programme — which are the same as those in the WADA code — for a
reduction from the default four-year suspension for the use of a non-specified substance such as meldonium.”Sharapova also claimed the ITF were not neutral in their

Sharapova also claimed the ITF were not neutral in their deliberations. “I went through the ITF hearing, which was in front of an arbitration (panel) which was chosen by the ITF,” she said. “I am at a hearing (in London) knowing the people I am speaking to were chosen by the people that I am actually in a fight with.

“They call that neutral? That is not neutral. CAS is neutral and this is what CAS has awarded to me.”

The ITF hit back in their statement, insisting that Sharapova and her legal team had the right to object to any
member of the independent tribunal. “The members of the independent tribunal, which consisted of a barrister as chairman and medical and scientific experts as co-members, are appointed by the ITF,” their statement added.”However,

“However, Ms. Sharapova’s legal team was given the opportunity to object to any member of that tribunal, and they
agreed in writing that they had no such objection.”Sharapova had admitted using

Sharapova had admitted using meldonium for 10 years to help treat illnesses, a heart issue and a magnesium
deficiency. She said she was unaware though that the substance had been added to the banned list by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) on January 1, shortly before her positive test.

The CAS decision means Sharapova will be able to return to action on the WTA Tour next April. She will, however, be back on the court as soon as next Monday when she takes part in a fundraiser event in Las Vegas.

Start your day the best way
with the Express Morning Briefing

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Sports News, download Indian Express App.

  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.