Monday, January 17, 2022

Rafale hearing: Making price public will help adversaries, govt tells SC

Two days after the government submitted details on the decision-making process leading the award of the Rafale fighter jet deal with France, the Supreme Court Wednesday resumed hearing a clutch of petitions seeking a probe into the deal.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi |
November 14, 2018 1:45:51 pm
The petitioners have questioned the government-to-government deal between India and France for purchase of 36 Rafale aircraft in flyaway condition.
The petitioners have questioned the government-to-government deal between India and France for purchase of 36 Rafale aircraft in flyaway condition.

Two days after the government submitted details on the decision-making process leading the award of the Rafale fighter jet deal with France, the Supreme Court Wednesday resumed hearing a clutch of petitions seeking a probe into the deal. The Centre Monday had handed over, in a sealed cover, one set of documents to the Supreme Court containing details of the pricing of the fighter aircraft. A second set was given to the petitioners in the case on the decision-making process leading to the award of the contract. The petitioners have questioned the government-to-government deal between India and France for purchase of 36 Rafale aircraft in flyaway condition.

The petitioners in the case include advocate Manohar Lal Sharma, lawyer Vinnet Dhanda, AAP MP Sanjay Singh and former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan.

During the hearing, Prashant Bhushan questioned Reliance as the choice of offset partner, a company with no experience in manufacturing defence aircraft. Prashant Bhushan said it was contrary to the procedure laid down as the choice was not disclosed to the Cabinet, Defence Acquisition Council nor the Defence Minister. He added that the government “short-circuited” the acquisition process, as it took the Inter-Government Agreement route to avoid giving tender.

On the price of the Rafale aircraft, Bhushan, who appeared on behalf of himself and Sinha and Shourie, said the government was hiding behind the secrecy clause of the agreement.

In response to Bhushan, Attorney General K K Venugopal said “secrecy agreement has to be secret”. He added that if the price is made public, adversaries would be able to relate it to the equipment.

The documents provided by the government Monday claimed that the delay in concluding the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) deal, during the UPA rule, gave India’s adversaries time to upgrade and equip their fighter fleets with advanced weaponry.

“During this long period of inconclusive 126 MMRCA process, our adversaries inducted modern aircraft and upgraded their older versions. They acquired better capability air-to-air missiles and inducted their indigenous fighters in large numbers. Further, they modernised and inducted aircraft with advanced weapon and radar capabilities,” the government said.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and comprising Justices U U Lalit and K M Joseph, is hearing the case. The bench last month sought details on the pricing of the Rafale jets. “The court would also like to be apprised of the details with regard to the pricing/cost, particularly, the advantage thereof, if any, which again will be submitted to the court in a sealed cover,” the bench said, adding that “details in this regard which may be considered to be strategic and confidential may, at this stage, be placed before the court and may not be furnished to the learned counsel for the parties or the petitioners-in-person”.

The court had set November 14 as the next date of hearing.

Start your day the best way
with the Express Morning Briefing

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
X