Thursday, October 28, 2021

Gujarat govvernemt to HC: 10% EWS quota does not violate Constitution

The Gujarat High court held, the Supreme Court's order providing 50 per cent ceiling for reservation as per the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case is not being violated.

By: PTI | Ahmedabad |
June 29, 2016 10:05:25 pm
Gurjarat, Gujarat Hight Court, economically weaker sections, economically weaker sections resevation, resevation 10 percent, economically weaker sections 10 percent resevation, Gujarat News, latest news, India news “State is enjoined to reach out to more deserving people…weaker section has no limitation in asmuch as they can be from any class or as individuals”, said the Gujarat High Court.

The Gujarat government on Wednesday, filed an affidavit in the state high court saying that the ordinance providing 10 per cent reservation to economically weaker sections (EWS) of unreserved category neither violates provisions of the Constitution nor does it go against the Supreme Court orders.

The affidavit said the reservation was necessitated as youths from economically weaker families of unreserved category were disappointed for not being provided enough opportunity.

The government filed its affidavit before a division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi in response to a series of PILs challenging the ordinance.


Watch Video: What’s making news


Additional Secretary of the Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Kaluji Vanzara, said in the affidavit that Article 46 of the Constitution provides that the state shall promote education and economic interests of the weaker sections of society and the ordinance was meant for the same. “State is enjoined to reach out to more deserving people…and cannot blind itself to the existence of other instances of weakness including economic weakness…weaker section has no limitation inasmuch as they can be from any class or as individuals,” it said.

It stated that the Supreme Court’s order providing 50 per cent ceiling for reservation as per the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case as referred by the petitioners, is not being violated.

“The ordinance provides for classification among open category to the extent of 10 per cent, which is not reservation as per Articles 15 (4) and 16 (4) of the Constitution, meant for SC, ST and BC categories.

“The ordinance should be read with Article 46 of the Constitution (which states that social justice is required for weaker sections of societies) and not with reference to Backward Class quota,” the affidavit said.

Start your day the best way
with the Express Morning Briefing

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by