Monday, November 29, 2021

Bombay HC judge raps firms for wasting time of judiciary

“There is not the slightest urgency, and this is evident from the delay thus far and the application for three weeks’ time for an affidavit in rejoinder,” said Patel.

Written by Khushboo Narayan | Mumbai |
March 1, 2017 3:57:13 am
Bombay high court, bombay high court judge, high court judge angry Mumbai High Court

Justice Gautam Patel of the Bombay High Court has pulled up companies for needlessly delaying the legal process in courts and consuming the scarce time of the judiciary. In the February 22 order pertaining to a battle of advertisement of women’s depilation products between Gillette India Ltd and Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd, Patel made a comment predicting the fate of the case, going by the adjournment of three weeks sought by Nimay Dave, lawyer for Gillette India, to file a rejoinder in the case. Gillette India is the petitioner in the case.

“Far be it for me to come between Mr Dave and his filings. Since Mr Dave says that there is a substantial reply and his rejoinder is likely to be equally substantial, the rejoinder is to be filed and served in the Registry on or before 15th April 2017. I have no doubt that a sur-rejoinder will also then be necessary. Rather than wasting time in an application for adjournment, affidavit in sur-rejoinder to be filed and served on or before 15th June 2017 and this will be followed by a month’s time until 20th July 2017 for an affidavit in sur-sur-rejoinder. At this point all filings will stop. By then the record should have crossed at least 2,000 pages. It will take any court some time to read all this material. Hence, list the matter for direction very low on board on 3rd November 2020,” said Patel.

“There is not the slightest urgency, and this is evident from the delay thus far and the application for three weeks’ time for an affidavit in rejoinder,” said Patel. He also said that the court would not entertain any application for priority hearing in the case until Gillette “deposits in advance an amount of not less than Rs 10 lakh to cover a potential order of costs for this attempt to consume scarce judicial time…”

Start your day the best way
with the Express Morning Briefing

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Mumbai News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
X